Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200vsHyundai Kona II 1.6T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023

2.0 D200

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Hyundai Kona II

1.6T

198 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    735 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Hyundai Kona II 1.6T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    133 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200HyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
204hp152kW
198hp148kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,928kg4,251lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight-
1,915kg4,222lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
93.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
73.1s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
56.1s
Calculated
47.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
886km550mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,797mm189in
4,350mm171in
Width
2,041mm80in
1,825mm72in
Height
1,683mm66in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,644mm65in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,663mm65in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
214mm8in
-
Trunk volume
735L
466L
Max trunk volume
1,798L
1,300L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
47L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200Hyundai Kona II 1.6TPowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D2003,750-4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
HyundaiKona II1.6T6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200HyundaiKona II1.6T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
56.1 s
47.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW
HyundaiKona II1.6T
198 hp
148 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 has 6 hp more than Hyundai Kona II 1.6T.

The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6T and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
HyundaiKona II1.6T
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
1,928 kg
4,251 lb
HyundaiKona II1.6T
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
210 km/h
130 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6T
209 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 has more power, Hyundai Kona II 1.6T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6T and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
HyundaiKona II1.6T
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW
8.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6T
198 hp
148 kW
7.8 s
209 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in
HyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
198 hp
148 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200HyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
204 hp
152 kW
198 hp
148 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
7.8 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,928 kg
4,251 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
886 km
550 mi
-
Trunk score
735 L
26.0 cu ft
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hyundai Kona II 1.6T

  • Is 438 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2.0 D200
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 vs Hyundai Kona II 1.6T - car comparison - FastVsFaster