Car comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsHyundai Kona II 1.6T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Hyundai Kona II

1.6T

198 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Hyundai Kona II 1.6T

  • Most powerful
    198 hp
    148 kW
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    133 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIHyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
190hp142kW
198hp148kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
1,915kg4,222lb
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
73.1s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
40.8s
Calculated
47.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
655km407mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,381mm172in
4,350mm171in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,825mm72in
Height
1,625mm64in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,600mm63in
Trunk volume
485L
466L
Max trunk volume-
1,300L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
47L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIHyundai Kona II 1.6TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
HyundaiKona II1.6T6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIHyundaiKona II1.6T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.8 s
47.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
HyundaiKona II1.6T
198 hp
148 kW

Hyundai Kona II 1.6T has 8 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
HyundaiKona II1.6T
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
HyundaiKona II1.6T
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6T
209 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.2 s
HyundaiKona II1.6T7.8 s

Although Hyundai Kona II 1.6T has more power, Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
HyundaiKona II1.6T
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6T
198 hp
148 kW
7.8 s
209 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
HyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
198 hp
148 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIHyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
190 hp
142 kW
198 hp
148 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
655 km
407 mi
-
Trunk score
485 L
17.1 cu ft
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Hyundai Kona II 1.6T

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 15 kg lighter
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Hyundai Kona II 1.6T - car comparison - FastVsFaster