Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsHyundai Kona II 1.6T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Kona II
1.6T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
- Most powerful198 hp148 kW
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 198hp148kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 1,915kg4,222lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.8s Calculated | 47.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 655km407mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,381mm172in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,625mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,600mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 466L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.8 s | 47.3 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 198 hp 148 kW |
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T has 8 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 7.8 s |
Although Hyundai Kona II 1.6T has more power, Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 198 hp 148 kW | 7.8 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | HyundaiKona II1.6T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 198 hp 148 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 655 km 407 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























