Car comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2026

1.6 T-GDI

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2026-present
VS

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,470 kg
    3,241 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    725 km
    450 mi
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,470kg3,241lb
1,505kg3,318lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
77.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
70.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
37.3s
Calculated
40.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
122hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
180Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
725km450mi
Calculated
655km407mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,380mm172in
4,381mm172in
Width
1,826mm72in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,495mm59in
1,625mm64in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,630mm104in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,572mm62in
Rear track
1,573mm62in
1,544mm61in
Trunk volume
426L
485L
Max trunk volume
1,378L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.3 s
40.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
180 hp
134 kW
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI.

The biggest power difference is between Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
725 km
450 mi
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
180 hp
134 kW
7.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.9 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Range score
725 km
450 mi
655 km
407 mi
Trunk score
426 L
15.0 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI

  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 70 km (43 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 59 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI vs Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster