Chevrolet Equinox III
Car comparison
Chevrolet Equinox III 550TvsLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
2.0 D240
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk431 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range970 km603 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletEquinox III550T | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 94.3s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 43.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 970km603mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,652mm183in | 4,597mm181in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,727mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | 157L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,505L | 1,651L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletEquinox III550T | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 43.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T has 20 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 2,015 kg 4,442 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Equinox III 550T and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 and Chevrolet Equinox III 550T: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 711 km 442 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 970 km 603 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletEquinox III550T | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletEquinox III550T | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 2,015 kg 4,442 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 970 km 603 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | 157 L 5.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Equinox III 550T | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Equinox III 550T
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 274 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
- Has 147 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























