Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4vsChevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013 2.0 TD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

1.6 T4

180 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2015
VS

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013

2.0 TD

163 hp1998 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD

  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,460 kg
    3,219 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Largest trunk
    469 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Power
180hp134kW
163hp122kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,460kg3,219lb
Gross weight
2,020kg4,453lb
1,998kg4,405lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
72.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
36.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton
Calculated
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,164km723mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,596cc97cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,603mm181in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,797mm71in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,685mm106in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,544mm61in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,558mm61in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
469L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
60L
CO2 emissions-
126g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TDPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T45,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,150 rpm
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD3,800 rpm1,750 rpm4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
36.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
163 hp
122 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 has 17 hp more than Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
1,460 kg
3,219 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
225 km/h
140 mph
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T48.3 s
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,164 km
723 mi
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW
8.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
163 hp
122 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
469 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,603 mm
181.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.3 s
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Power
180 hp
134 kW
163 hp
122 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
469 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,603 mm
181.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,164 km
723 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
CO2 score
-
126 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
469 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 86 km (54 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 89 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 1.6 T4
Chevrolet Cruze Sedan 2.0 TD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 TD
C 180
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180
1.6 T4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 TD
2.0 TDI
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI
1.6 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0 TD
1.6 THP
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsPeugeot408 II1.6 THP
1.6 T4
E 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
1.6 T4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
1.6 T4
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TD
2.0d
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0 TD
2.0d
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1.6 T4
2.4 i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 vs Chevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013 2.0 TD - car comparison - FastVsFaster