Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20VvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.6 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk404 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.2s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,435cc149cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,476mm176in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 203g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.2 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 has 10 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 8.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 has more power, Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 729 km 453 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 203 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 434 km (270 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























