Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20VvsVolvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.4 i 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 729km453mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,435cc149cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,476mm176in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,106L | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 203g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW |
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has 40 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.7 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | VolvoS40 II2.4 i 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 729 km 453 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 203 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i 20V
- Is 130 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























