Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsChevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013 2.0 TD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013
2.0 TD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,341 km834 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,998kg4,405lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 36.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,341km834mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,603mm181in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,797mm71in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 469L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 3,800 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 36.3 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 163 hp 122 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.7 s |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,341 km 834 mi |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,341 km 834 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 469 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,076 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 91 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























