Car comparison

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013 2.0 TDvsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013

2.0 TD

163 hp1998 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2016
VS

Suzuki Kizashi

2.4

178 hp2393 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,460 kg
    3,219 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    126 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Largest trunk
    469 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Most powerful
    178 hp
    133 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDSuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
163hp122kW
178hp133kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,460kg3,219lb
1,494kg3,294lb
Gross weight
1,998kg4,405lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
63.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
36.3s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,250km777mi
Calculated
797km496mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,393cc146cu in
Length
4,603mm181in
4,650mm183in
Width
1,797mm71in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,685mm106in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,544mm61in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
469L
-
Max trunk volume-
461L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
63L
CO2 emissions
126g/km
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TDSuzuki Kizashi 2.4PowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD: Power / Torque
  • Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD3,800 rpm1,750 rpm4,050 rpm
SuzukiKizashi2.46,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDSuzukiKizashi2.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.3 s
35.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
163 hp
122 kW
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 has 15 hp more than Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
SuzukiKizashi2.4
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
SuzukiKizashi2.4
1,494 kg
3,294 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD8.5 s
SuzukiKizashi2.47.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 3.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
1,250 km
777 mi
SuzukiKizashi2.4
797 km
496 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
163 hp
122 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW
7.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
469 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,603 mm
181.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDSuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
163 hp
122 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
1,494 kg
3,294 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
469 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,603 mm
181.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
1,250 km
777 mi
797 km
496 mi
CO2 score
126 g/km
183 g/km
Trunk score
469 L
16.6 cu ft
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TDSuzuki Kizashi 2.4
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Cruze Sedan Facelift 2013 2.0 TD

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 34 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 453 km (281 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 8 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 57 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Cruze Sedan 2.0 TD
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TD
C 180
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
2.0 TD
2.0 TDI
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC
2.0 TD
1.6 THP
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsPeugeot408 II1.6 THP
2.4
2.0 TDI
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
2.0 TD
E 220 BlueTEC
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC
2.4
1.6 T4
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
2.0 TD
2.0d
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis III2.2 D-CAT
2.0 TD
2.0d
VS
ChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TDvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Chevrolet Cruze Sedan · Facelift 2013 2.0 TD vs Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster