Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 TvsLynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 05
+ 2.0TD T5 Evo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,512 kg3,333 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range766 km476 mi
- Best performance score62/100
Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk336 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,512kg3,333lb | 1,798kg3,964lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,173kg4,791lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 91.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 659km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,614mm182in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,628mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | 2,734mm108in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,593mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 336L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,070L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T has 10 hp more than Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 1,798 kg 3,964 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5.9 s |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 766 km 476 mi |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 659 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | 1,798 kg 3,964 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 659 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 336 L 11.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T | Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 286 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























