Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsTVR Chimaera 4.3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTVR Chimaera
4.3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score42/100
TVR Chimaera 4.3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight264 hp/t197 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best performance score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | TVRChimaera4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 472Nm348lb-ft | 398Nm294lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,060kg2,337lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 47.2s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 375Nm/t251lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 538km334mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 4,275cc261cu in |
| Length | 4,914mm193in | 3,965mm156in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,223mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,282mm90in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,460mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 278g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- TVR Chimaera 4.3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | TVRChimaera4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.2 s | 14.8 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 186 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 30 hp more than TVR Chimaera 4.3.
The biggest power difference is between TVR Chimaera 4.3 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 398 Nm 294 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 253 km/h 157 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 4.4 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, TVR Chimaera 4.3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Chimaera 4.3 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.4 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TVRChimaera4.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | TVRChimaera4.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | 398 Nm 294 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 538 km 334 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 278 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 74 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
TVR Chimaera 4.3
- Is 545 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 71 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























