Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 CLK 430vsTVR Chimaera 4.3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTVR Chimaera
4.3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Chimaera 4.3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight264 hp/t197 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption17.7 L/100 km13.3 mpg US16.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | TVRChimaera4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 279hp208kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 398Nm294lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 1,060kg2,337lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 47.2s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 375Nm/t251lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 508km316mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,266cc260cu in | 4,275cc261cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 3,965mm156in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,382mm54in | 1,223mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,282mm90in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,460mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 310L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 57L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: Power / Torque
- TVR Chimaera 4.3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 5,750 rpm | 3,000-4,400 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | TVRChimaera4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.1 s | 14.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 186 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 279 hp 208 kW |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 280 hp 209 kW |
TVR Chimaera 4.3 has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430 and TVR Chimaera 4.3: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 398 Nm 294 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 253 km/h 157 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 7.4 s |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Chimaera 4.3 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: 3.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 279 hp 208 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TVRChimaera4.3 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.4 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TVRChimaera4.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | TVRChimaera4.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 279 hp 208 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 398 Nm 294 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 508 km 316 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430
- Has 2 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
TVR Chimaera 4.3
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 695 kg lighter
- Is 3.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 105 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























