Car comparison

Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet

3.4 i V8 32V

300 hp3405 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1989-1993
VS

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph
  • Lightest
    1,545 kg
    3,406 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    194 hp/t
    145 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    723 km
    449 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    44/100

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    461 Nm
    340 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
300hp224kW
310hp231kW
Torque
323Nm238lb-ft
461Nm340lb-ft
Curb weight
1,545kg3,406lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
1,825kg4,023lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
To 99% top speed
88.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
22.3s
Calculated
22.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
194hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
723km449mi
Calculated
512km318mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,405cc208cu in
5,665cc346cu in
Length
4,535mm179in
4,914mm193in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,235mm49in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,568mm101in
Front track
1,520mm60in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,560mm61in
1,540mm61in
Trunk volume
300L
215L
Max trunk volume-
930L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
86L
64L
CO2 emissions-
293g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32VChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque
  • Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V7,200 rpm4,200 rpm7,450 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.3 s
22.8 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 10 hp more than Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
323 Nm
238 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
461 Nm
340 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
265 km/h
165 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
257 km/h
160 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
194 hp/t
145 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
300 hp
224 kW
6.3 s
265 km/h
165 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
6.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,235 mm
48.6 in
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
6.3 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
194 hp/t
145 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
323 Nm
238 lb-ft
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.0 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
Lightness
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,235 mm
48.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
723 km
449 mi
512 km
318 mi
CO2 score
-
293 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
194 hp/t
145 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32VChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V

  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 85 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 138 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V vs Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster