Car comparison

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4vsChevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi 3000 GT

3.0 i 24V 4x4

286 hp2972 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1992-1993

Chevrolet Camaro IV

Z28 5.7 i V8

285 hp5737 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1997-1998

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4

Quickest 0-100 km/h
5.0 s
Fastest top speed
260 km/h
162 mph Unrestricted
250 km/h
155 mph Restricted
Most powerful
286 hp
213 kW
Lowest city consumption
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Best overall score
61/100
Best performance score
65/100
Best economy score
0/100

Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8

Highest torque
441 Nm
325 lb-ft
Lightest
1,644 kg
3,624 lb
Best power-to-weight
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Largest trunk
365 L
Best practicality score
53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
Power	286hp213kW	285hp213kW
Torque	407Nm300lb-ft	441Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight	1,745kg3,847lb	1,644kg3,624lb
Gross weight	2,120kg4,674lb	1,922kg4,237lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated	254 km/h 158 mph
To 99% top speed	72.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated	85.8s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	5.0s	6.0s
0-200 km/h	18.6s Calculated	23.2s Calculated
0-60 mph	4.7s Calculated	5.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption city	15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK	19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK	9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Quarter mile	13.2s Calculated	14.1s Calculated
Power-to-weight	164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated	173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated	268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated
Displacement	2,972cc181cu in	5,737cc350cu in
Length	4,555mm179in	4,907mm193in
Width	1,840mm72in	1,882mm74in
Height	1,285mm51in	1,303mm51in
Wheelbase	2,470mm97in	2,568mm101in
Front track	1,560mm61in	1,542mm61in
Rear track	1,580mm62in	1,539mm61in
Trunk volume	-	365L
Max trunk volume	160L	930L
Doors	2	3
Seats	4	4
Fuel tank	75L	59L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	6,000 rpm	3,000 rpm	6,250 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	5,000 rpm	2,400 rpm	5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	4.7 s	5.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	5.0 s	6.0 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	18.6 s	23.2 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited	254 km/h 158 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.1 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	5.7 s	6.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	8.6 s	9.2 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.1 s	11.9 s
1/4 mile 402 m	13.2 s	14.1 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	173 km/h 108 mph	163 km/h 101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	286 hp 213 kW
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	285 hp 213 kW

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 has 1 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 and Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	407 Nm 300 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	441 Nm 325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	1,745 kg 3,847 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	1,644 kg 3,624 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	254 km/h 158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	5.0 s
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	6.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4	286 hp 213 kW	5.0 s	Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8	285 hp 213 kW	6.0 s	254 km/h 158 mph