Chevrolet Camaro IV
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8vsJaguar XJS Coupe 5.3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJS Coupe
5.3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque441 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,644 kg3,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption19.8 L/100 km11.9 mpg US14.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3
- Largest trunk407 L
- Best economy score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 285hp213kW | 284hp212kW |
| Torque | 441Nm325lb-ft | 415Nm306lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,644kg3,624lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Gross weight | 1,922kg4,237lb | 2,175kg4,795lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 101.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 664km413mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,737cc350cu in | 5,343cc326cu in |
| Length | 4,907mm193in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,254mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,489mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,504mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 407L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 89L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 5,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 5,500 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 284 hp 212 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 has 1 hp more than Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 415 Nm 306 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 and Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: 2.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | 284 hp 212 kW | 8.2 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | JaguarXJS Coupe5.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp 213 kW | 284 hp 212 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | 415 Nm 306 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 664 km 413 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 407 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 181 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3
- Has 42 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























