Car comparison

Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32VvsJaguar XJS Coupe 5.3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari Mondial

3.4 i V8 32V

286 hp3405 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1989-1993
VS

Jaguar XJS Coupe

5.3

284 hp5343 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1991-1994

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    255 km/h
    158 mph
  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    183 hp/t
    137 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    807 km
    501 mi
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3

  • Highest torque
    415 Nm
    306 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    19.9 L/100 km
    11.8 mpg US
    14.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    407 L
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32VJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
286hp213kW
284hp212kW
Torque
309Nm228lb-ft
415Nm306lb-ft
Curb weight
1,560kg3,439lb
1,825kg4,023lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
83.6s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
101.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
23.3s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK
19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
807km501mi
Calculated
664km413mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,405cc208cu in
5,343cc326cu in
Length
4,535mm179in
4,820mm190in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,793mm71in
Height
1,235mm49in
1,254mm49in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,520mm60in
1,489mm59in
Rear track
1,560mm61in
1,504mm59in
Trunk volume
300L
407L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
96L
89L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32VJaguar XJS Coupe 5.3PowerTorque
  • Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V7,200 rpm4,300 rpm7,450 rpm
JaguarXJS Coupe5.35,500 rpm2,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32VJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.3 s
34.7 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
284 hp
212 kW

Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V has 2 hp more than Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3 and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
415 Nm
306 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
1,825 kg
4,023 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
255 km/h
158 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V6.3 s
JaguarXJS Coupe5.38.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V and Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: 1.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V and Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
807 km
501 mi
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
664 km
413 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
6.3 s
255 km/h
158 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
284 hp
212 kW
8.2 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,235 mm
48.6 in
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,254 mm
49.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK

Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
6.3 s
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32VJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
286 hp
213 kW
284 hp
212 kW
Torque
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
415 Nm
306 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
8.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,235 mm
48.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,254 mm
49.4 in
Range score
807 km
501 mi
664 km
413 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32VJaguar XJS Coupe 5.3
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km23.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi37.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year3,518 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 265 kg lighter
  • Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 143 km (89 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3

  • Has 106 Nm more
  • Has 107 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.4 i V8 32V
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32VvsFerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
5.3
3.0 Twin Turbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
3.4 i V8 32V
3.4 V8
VS
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32VvsFerrari348 TB3.4 V8
5.3
3.0 i 24V 4x4
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
3.4 i V8 32V
3.2 V8
VS
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32VvsFerrari328 GTB3.2 V8
5.3
3.0i
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i
5.3
320 CE
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsMercedes-BenzC124Facelift 1989320 CE
5.3
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
5.3
2.8 24V Biturbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsMaseratiGhibli II2.8 24V Biturbo
3.4 i V8 32V
2.5 Turbo S CAT
VS
FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32VvsPorsche9442.5 Turbo S CAT
5.3
5.3
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsAston MartinVirage5.3
5.3
3.0 i V6 Turbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsAlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V vs Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster