Car comparison

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 TurbovsJaguar XJS Coupe 5.3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpine A610

3.0 i V6 Turbo

250 hp2975 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1991-1995
VS

Jaguar XJS Coupe

5.3

284 hp5343 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1991-1994

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    870 km
    540 mi
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3

  • Most powerful
    284 hp
    212 kW
  • Highest torque
    415 Nm
    306 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    407 L
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurboJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
250hp186kW
284hp212kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
415Nm306lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
1,825kg4,023lb
Gross weight
1,740kg3,836lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
75.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
101.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
19.7s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
870km540mi
Calculated
664km413mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,975cc182cu in
5,343cc326cu in
Length
4,410mm174in
4,820mm190in
Width
1,760mm69in
1,793mm71in
Height
1,180mm46in
1,254mm49in
Wheelbase
2,340mm92in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,489mm59in
Rear track
1,470mm58in
1,504mm59in
Trunk volume
90L
407L
Max trunk volume
220L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
80L
89L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 TurboJaguar XJS Coupe 5.3PowerTorque
  • Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo5,750 rpm2,900 rpm6,000 rpm
JaguarXJS Coupe5.35,500 rpm2,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurboJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.7 s
34.7 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.6 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
170 km/h
106 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
250 hp
186 kW
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
284 hp
212 kW

Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3 has 34 hp more than Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: 34 hp (25 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
415 Nm
306 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
1,825 kg
4,023 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
265 km/h
165 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo5.7 s
JaguarXJS Coupe5.38.2 s

Although Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3 has more power, Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: 2.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3: 4.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
870 km
540 mi
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
664 km
413 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
250 hp
186 kW
5.7 s
265 km/h
165 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
284 hp
212 kW
8.2 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
90 L
3.2 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,254 mm
49.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
5.7 s
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurboJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
Power
250 hp
186 kW
284 hp
212 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
415 Nm
306 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
8.2 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
90 L
3.2 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,254 mm
49.4 in
Range score
870 km
540 mi
664 km
413 mi
Trunk score
90 L
3.2 cu ft
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpine A610 3.0 i V6 TurboJaguar XJS Coupe 5.3
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km23.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi37.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year3,518 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo

  • Is 405 kg lighter
  • Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 205 km (128 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3

  • Has 34 hp more
  • Has 65 Nm more
  • Has 317 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo
Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.5 Turbo S CAT
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsPorsche9442.5 Turbo S CAT
5.3
3.0 Twin Turbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.2i Turbo 20V
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsAUDIS2 Coupe2.2i Turbo 20V
5.3
3.0 i 24V 4x4
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
5.3
3.0i
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i
5.3
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
5.3
320 CE
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsMercedes-BenzC124Facelift 1989320 CE
3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.8 24V Biturbo
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsMaseratiGhibli II2.8 24V Biturbo
3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.8 i V6 Turbo
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsMaserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo
5.3
5.3
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsAston MartinVirage5.3
3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.5
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsBMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5
5.3
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe5.3vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo vs Jaguar XJS Coupe 5.3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster