Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

ChangAn UNI-Z

1.5T

192 hp1494 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T

  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    310 Nm
    229 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    771 km
    479 mi
  • Largest trunk
    638 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
170hp127kW
192hp143kW
Torque
248Nm183lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
1,315kg2,899lb
1,500kg3,307lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,895kg4,178lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
76.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
47.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33mpg US39.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
646km402mi
Calculated
771km479mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,494cc91cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,730mm186in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,533mm60in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,795mm110in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,603mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,603mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
638L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,425L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostChangAn UNI-Z 1.5TPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T5,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
47.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
192 hp
143 kW

ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T has 22 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: 22 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
1,500 kg
3,307 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T7.8 s

Although ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
771 km
479 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
192 hp
143 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Length
4,730 mm
186.2 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostChangAnUNI-Z1.5T
Power
170 hp
127 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.0 mpg US
39.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Length
4,730 mm
186.2 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
646 km
402 mi
771 km
479 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33 mpg US39.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km12.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi20.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,070 L283 US gal235 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,872 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 185 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T

  • Has 22 hp more
  • Has 62 Nm more
  • Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 182 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.5T
GLB 220
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.5T
1.6T
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.5T
2.0 TDI
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI
1.5T
40 TDI
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1.5T
2.0 TSI
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 250e
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
1.5T
2.0 TSI
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1.5T
S 2.0
VS
ChangAnUNI-Z1.5TvsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost vs ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster