Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0vsChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChangAn UNI-Z
1.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range783 km486 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score88/100
ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk638 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 76.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 47.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33mpg US39.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 771km479mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,494cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,730mm186in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | - | 1,603mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,603mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 638L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,425L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: Power / Torque
- ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 47.3 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 has 12 hp more than ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T.
The biggest power difference is between ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T and Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 7.1 s |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 and ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 7.1 L/100 km 33.0 mpg US 39.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 783 km 486 mi |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 771 km 479 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.0 mpg US 39.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 7.1 L/100 km 33.0 mpg US 39.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.0 mpg US 39.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | ChangAnUNI-Z1.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.0 mpg US 39.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 771 km 479 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 638 L 22.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 | ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33 mpg US39.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 20.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,070 L283 US gal235 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,872 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
ChangAn UNI-Z 1.5T
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 188 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























