Ford Explorer VI
Car comparison
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6vsChangan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChangan Nevo E07
89.98 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful349 hp260 kW
- Highest torque555 Nm409 lb-ft
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score99/100
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Lightest2,278 kg5,022 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 349hp260kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 555Nm409lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,391kg5,271lb | 2,278kg5,022lb |
| Gross weight | 3,160kg6,967lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 75.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 160Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,476km1,538mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,956cc180cu in | - |
| Length | 5,049mm199in | 5,045mm199in |
| Width | 2,004mm79in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,778mm70in | 1,695mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 3,025mm119in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | - | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,690mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,274L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 75.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 343 hp 256 kW |
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 has 6 hp more than Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh and Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 2,278 kg 5,022 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 6.0 s |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 343 hp 256 kW | 6.7 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349 hp 260 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb | 2,278 kg 5,022 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,476 km 1,538 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 5.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 8.17 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 435 L115 US gal96 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 761.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Is 113 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 194 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























