Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 450+ 125 kWh
360 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2023-present
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsChangan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Changan Nevo E07
89.98 kWh
343 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2024-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWh
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque568 Nm419 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest2,278 kg5,022 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 568Nm419lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,655kg5,853lb | 2,278kg5,022lb |
| Gross weight | 3,300kg7,275lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 63.9s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.2s Calculated | 75.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 160Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,125mm202in | 5,045mm199in |
| Width | 1,959mm77in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,718mm68in | 1,695mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,681mm66in | 1,690mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,100L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.2 s | 75.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 343 hp 256 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWh has 17 hp more than Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWh: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 2,278 kg 5,022 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | 6.8 s |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 6.7 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWh has more power, Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 343 hp 256 kW | 6.7 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb | 2,278 kg 5,022 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWh
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 203 Nm more
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Is 377 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 125 kWh
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 350 85 kWh
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsTeslaModel YLong Range 78.1 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 450d
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsAUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsAUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 105 kWh
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2026GLS 450d
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023AMG GLB 35
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI