AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback
50 95 kWh
340 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-present
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWhvsChangan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Changan Nevo E07
89.98 kWh
343 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2024-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Highest torque664 Nm490 lb-ft
- Largest trunk528 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score0/100
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Lightest2,278 kg5,022 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 664Nm490lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,278kg5,022lb |
| Gross weight | 3,170kg6,989lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.6s Calculated | 75.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 160Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,915mm194in | 5,045mm199in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,619mm64in | 1,695mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,928mm115in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,690mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 528L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,567L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.6 s | 75.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 343 hp 256 kW |
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh has 3 hp more than AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh and Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 2,278 kg 5,022 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 6.0 s |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 6.7 s |
Although Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh has more power, AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh and Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | 343 hp 256 kW | 6.7 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh | Changan NevoE0789.98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | 2,278 kg 5,022 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 528 L 18.6 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh
- Has 299 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 232 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q8 e-tron Sportback 50 95 kWh
Changan Nevo E07 89.98 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWhvsAUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsTeslaModel YLong Range 78.1 kWh
AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWhvsAUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 125 kWh
AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWhvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202355 TFSI V6
AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWhvsAUDIQ650 TFSI V6
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 350 85 kWh
AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWhvsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 105 kWh
AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWhvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
Changan NevoE0789.98 kWhvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI
AUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWhvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI