Cadillac XT5
Car comparison
Cadillac XT5 3.6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,024 km636 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful314 hp234 kW
- Lightest1,931 kg4,257 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacXT53.6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 314hp234kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 368Nm271lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,931kg4,257lb | 2,443kg5,386lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 3,210kg7,077lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 106.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 51.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 830km516mi Calculated | 1,024km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,649cc223cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,815mm190in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,675mm66in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 3,122mm123in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,638mm64in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 850L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,784L | 2,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 86L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac XT5 3.6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 6,700 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacXT53.6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 51.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Cadillac XT5 3.6 has 13 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 2,443 kg 5,386 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 7.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 830 km 516 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 1,024 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacXT53.6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 314 hp 234 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb | 2,443 kg 5,386 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 830 km 516 mi | 1,024 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 850 L 30.0 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac XT5 3.6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 512 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Has 282 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 194 km (120 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























