AUDI Q6
Car comparison
AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,024 km636 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score93/100
AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted207 km/h129 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,280 kg5,027 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,443kg5,386lb |
| Gross weight | 2,780kg6,129lb | 3,210kg7,077lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 106.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.1s Calculated | 51.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.9mpg US27.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 683km424mi Calculated | 1,024km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,492cc152cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,099mm201in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 2,014mm79in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,784mm70in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 3,122mm123in |
| Front track | 1,704mm67in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,721mm68in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,398L | 2,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.1 s | 51.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 has 2 hp more than AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 2,443 kg 5,386 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 7.8 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 has more power, AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 and AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 683 km 424 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 1,024 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ650 TFSI V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb | 2,443 kg 5,386 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 683 km 424 mi | 1,024 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.9 mpg US27.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.94 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.87 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,538 L406 US gal338 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,691 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6
- Is 163 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D300
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 341 km (212 mi) more estimated range
- Has 614 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























