Wiesmann GT MF4
Car comparison
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8vsCadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XLR
V 4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed293 km/h182 mph
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Best power-to-weight307 hp/t229 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.2 L/100 km13.7 mpg US16.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Most powerful449 hp335 kW
- Highest torque561 Nm414 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 561Nm414lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | - |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.8s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 4,371cc267cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,513mm178in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,190mm47in | 1,279mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,507mm99in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 328L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 295g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW |
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V has 29 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
Although Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V has more power, Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.4 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 295 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 161 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























