Car comparison

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8vsCadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Wiesmann GT MF4

S 4.0 V8

420 hp3999 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2014
VS

Cadillac XLR

V 4.4 i V8 32V

449 hp4371 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    293 km/h
    182 mph
  • Lightest
    1,370 kg
    3,020 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    307 hp/t
    229 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.2 L/100 km
    13.7 mpg US
    16.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    78/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    38/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelWiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Power
420hp313kW
449hp335kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
561Nm414lb-ft
Curb weight
1,370kg3,020lb
1,730kg3,814lb
Gross weight
1,620kg3,571lb
-
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.8s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph
Calculated
61.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
12.9s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb
Calculated
260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
569km354mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,999cc244cu in
4,371cc267cu in
Length
4,230mm167in
4,513mm178in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,836mm72in
Height
1,190mm47in
1,279mm50in
Wheelbase
2,507mm99in
2,685mm106in
Front track-
1,565mm62in
Rear track-
1,578mm62in
Trunk volume-
125L
Max trunk volume-
328L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
70L
68L
CO2 emissions
295g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V88,300 rpm3,900 rpm8,550 rpm
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V6,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricWiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.9 s
16.5 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
195 km/h
121 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
420 hp
313 kW
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
449 hp
335 kW

Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V has 29 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
561 Nm
414 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
1,730 kg
3,814 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
293 km/h
182 mph
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V84.4 s
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V4.9 s

Although Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V has more power, Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
260 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
420 hp
313 kW
4.4 s
293 km/h
182 mph
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
449 hp
335 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Power
449 hp
335 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
125 L
4.4 cu ft
Length
4,513 mm
177.7 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleWiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Power
420 hp
313 kW
449 hp
335 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
561 Nm
414 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.9 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
1,730 kg
3,814 lb
Fuel consumption
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
125 L
4.4 cu ft
Length
4,513 mm
177.7 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in
Range score
569 km
354 mi
-
CO2 score
295 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
125 L
4.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
260 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleWiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
Consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8

  • Is 360 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 vs Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster