Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsWiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005

AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8

507 hp6208 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2007-2009
VS

Wiesmann GT MF4

S 4.0 V8

420 hp3999 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8

  • Lightest
    1,370 kg
    3,020 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    307 hp/t
    229 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.2 L/100 km
    13.7 mpg US
    16.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    569 km
    354 mi
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Power
507hp378kW
420hp313kW
Torque
630Nm465lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,685kg3,715lb
1,370kg3,020lb
Gross weight
1,995kg4,398lb
1,620kg3,571lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
293 km/h
182 mph
To 99% top speed
85.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
57.2s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
13.8s
13.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
23.3L/100 km10.1mpg US12.1mpg UK
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb
Calculated
307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
405km252mi
Calculated
569km354mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,208cc379cu in
3,999cc244cu in
Length
4,657mm183in
4,230mm167in
Width
1,833mm72in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,365mm54in
1,190mm47in
Wheelbase
2,715mm107in
2,507mm99in
Trunk volume
435L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
62L
70L
CO2 emissions-
295g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V86,800 rpm5,250 rpm7,050 rpm
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V88,300 rpm3,900 rpm8,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.8 s
13.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Limited
293 km/h
182 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
189 km/h
117 mph
195 km/h
121 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 has 87 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: 87 hp (65 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
1,370 kg
3,020 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
293 km/h
182 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 and Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
15.3 L/100 km
15.4 mpg US
18.5 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
507 hp
378 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
420 hp
313 kW
4.4 s
293 km/h
182 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,365 mm
53.7 in
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
15.3 L/100 km
15.4 mpg US
18.5 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
15.3 L/100 km
15.4 mpg US
18.5 mpg UK
4.3 s
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
15.3 L/100 km
15.4 mpg US
18.5 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
420 hp
313 kW
Torque
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
293 km/h
182 mph
Lightness
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
Fuel consumption
15.3 L/100 km
15.4 mpg US
18.5 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,365 mm
53.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
Range score
405 km
252 mi
569 km
354 mi
CO2 score
-
295 g/km
Trunk score
435 L
15.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
Consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km26.78 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi43.09 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,295 L606 US gal505 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,016 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8

  • Is 315 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 vs Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster