Cadillac XLR
Car comparison
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32VvsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Coupe (X150)
R 4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Lightest1,695 kg3,737 lb
- Lowest city consumption19.1 L/100 km12.3 mpg US14.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful449 hp335 kW
- Highest torque561 Nm414 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449hp335kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 561Nm414lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.5s Calculated | 17.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,371cc267cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,513mm178in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 1,836mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,685mm106in | 2,752mm108in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 125L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 328L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.5 s | 17.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V has 33 hp more than Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp 335 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 1 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 175 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























