BMW M6 (E63)
Car comparison
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10vsCadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XLR
V 4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t221 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Highest torque561 Nm414 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption21.1 L/100 km11.1 mpg US13.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 561Nm414lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 473km294mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,999cc305cu in | 4,371cc267cu in |
| Length | 4,871mm192in | 4,513mm178in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,279mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,781mm109in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,584mm62in | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 328L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW |
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 has 58 hp more than Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V and BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: 58 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 4.6 s |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 473 km 294 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Has 58 hp more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 325 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 41 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























