Car comparison

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10vsCadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M6 (E63)

5.0 V10

507 hp4999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2005-2007
VS

Cadillac XLR

V 4.4 i V8 32V

449 hp4371 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    507 hp
    378 kW
  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    296 hp/t
    221 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    80/100
  • Best economy score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Power
507hp378kW
449hp335kW
Torque
520Nm384lb-ft
561Nm414lb-ft
Curb weight
1,710kg3,770lb
1,730kg3,814lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
57.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
61.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
15.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb
Calculated
260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
473km294mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,999cc305cu in
4,371cc267cu in
Length
4,871mm192in
4,513mm178in
Width
1,855mm73in
1,836mm72in
Height
1,372mm54in
1,279mm50in
Wheelbase
2,781mm109in
2,685mm106in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,584mm62in
1,578mm62in
Trunk volume
450L
125L
Max trunk volume-
328L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
70L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V107,750 rpm6,100 rpm8,250 rpm
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V6,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.4 s
16.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
114 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
507 hp
378 kW
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
449 hp
335 kW

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 has 58 hp more than Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V and BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: 58 hp (43 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
561 Nm
414 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
1,730 kg
3,814 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V104.6 s
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V4.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
296 hp/t
221 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
260 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
507 hp
378 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
449 hp
335 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,871 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Power
449 hp
335 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
125 L
4.4 cu ft
Length
4,513 mm
177.7 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V
Power
507 hp
378 kW
449 hp
335 kW
Torque
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
561 Nm
414 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
1,730 kg
3,814 lb
Fuel consumption
14.8 L/100 km
15.9 mpg US
19.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,871 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
125 L
4.4 cu ft
Length
4,513 mm
177.7 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in
Range score
473 km
294 mi
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
125 L
4.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
296 hp/t
221 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
260 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
Consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.68 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,885 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10

  • Has 58 hp more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 325 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 vs Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster