BMW M6 (E63)
Car comparison
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10vsBMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M6 Convertible (E64)
5.0 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t221 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.8 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range473 km294 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 473km294mi Calculated | 461km286mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,999cc305cu in | 4,999cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,871mm192in | 4,871mm192in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,377mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,781mm109in | 2,781mm109in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,584mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
- BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 4.6 s |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 473 km 294 mi |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 461 km 286 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 |
| 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 473 km 294 mi | 461 km 286 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 | BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK | 15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.90 LC100 km | 26.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi | 42.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal | 2,280 L602 US gal502 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,885 LC/year | 3,990 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























