Car comparison

BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10vsJaguar XK Convertible (X150) · Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M6 Convertible (E64)

5.0 V10

507 hp4999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2006-2007
VS

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) · Facelift 2009

R 5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCabriolet / convertible2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    625 Nm
    461 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,800 kg
    3,968 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    283 hp/t
    211 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.9 L/100 km
    12.4 mpg US
    14.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    574 km
    357 mi
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    81/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best practicality score
    45/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
507hp378kW
510hp380kW
Torque
520Nm384lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
1,930kg4,255lb
1,800kg3,968lb
Gross weight
2,380kg5,247lb
2,185kg4,817lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
58.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
4.8s
0-200 km/h
17.0s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.9s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb
Calculated
283hp/t211kW/t129hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
461km286mi
Calculated
574km357mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,999cc305cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,871mm192in
4,794mm189in
Width
1,855mm73in
1,892mm74in
Height
1,377mm54in
1,329mm52in
Wheelbase
2,781mm109in
2,752mm108in
Front track
1,567mm62in
-
Rear track
1,584mm62in
-
Ground clearance-
100mm4in
Trunk volume
300L
200L
Max trunk volume
350L
313L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
71L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V107,750 rpm6,100 rpm8,250 rpm
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
4.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.0 s
16.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
111 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
507 hp
378 kW
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 has 3 hp more than BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10 and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
1,800 kg
3,968 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V104.8 s
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V84.8 s

Although Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 has more power, BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
15.2 L/100 km
15.5 mpg US
18.6 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 and BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
263 hp/t
196 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
461 km
286 mi
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
574 km
357 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
507 hp
378 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,871 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,377 mm
54.2 in
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
15.2 L/100 km
15.5 mpg US
18.6 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
15.2 L/100 km
15.5 mpg US
18.6 mpg UK
4.8 s
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
263 hp/t
196 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
15.2 L/100 km
15.5 mpg US
18.6 mpg UK
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
Fuel consumption
15.2 L/100 km
15.5 mpg US
18.6 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,871 mm
191.8 in
Height
1,377 mm
54.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in
Range score
461 km
286 mi
574 km
357 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
263 hp/t
196 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8
Consumption15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km26.60 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi42.81 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,280 L602 US gal502 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,990 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10

  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 105 Nm more
  • Is 130 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.0 V10
5.0 V10
VS
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10vsBMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
5.0 V10
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
5.0 V10
4.9
VS
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10vsBMWZ8 (E52)4.9
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
5.0 V10
650i
VS
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)650i
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
5.0 V10
650i
VS
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10vsBMW6 Series Convertible (F12)650i
R 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
5.0 V10
650i
VS
BMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007650i
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type Convertible5.0 V8
BMW M6 Convertible (E64) 5.0 V10 vs Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) · Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster