BMW M6 (E63)
Car comparison
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C216)
AMG CL 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t221 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.8 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score67/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Best estimated range604 km375 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,510kg5,534lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 59.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 261hp/t195kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 473km294mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,999cc305cu in | 6,208cc379cu in |
| Length | 4,871mm192in | 5,090mm200in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,418mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,781mm109in | 2,955mm116in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,584mm62in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8 has 18 hp more than BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8 has more power, BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 473 km 294 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 604 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 473 km 294 mi | 604 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.90 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,885 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























