BMW M6 (E63)
Car comparison
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C216)
CL 600 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12
- Most powerful517 hp386 kW
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.7 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score55/100
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t221 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 517hp386kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 830Nm612lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 21.7L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 473km294mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,999cc305cu in | 5,513cc336cu in |
| Length | 4,871mm192in | 5,065mm199in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,419mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,781mm109in | 2,955mm116in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,584mm62in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 5,000 rpm | 1,900-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 15.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 has 10 hp more than BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 4.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 has more power, BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 and BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 473 km 294 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)CL 600 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 517 hp 386 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 473 km 294 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.90 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,885 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Is 400 kg lighter
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) CL 600 V12
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 310 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























