BMW M3 Coupe (E92)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8vsCadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XLR
V 4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight266 hp/t198 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Most powerful449 hp335 kW
- Highest torque561 Nm414 lb-ft
- Best performance score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 561Nm414lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 508km316mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 4,371cc267cu in |
| Length | 4,615mm182in | 4,513mm178in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,279mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 328L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW |
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V has 29 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
Although Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V has more power, BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 508 km 316 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 305 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 161 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























