Cadillac XLR
Car comparison
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32VvsRolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Phantom Coupe
6.75 i V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.1 L/100 km11.1 mpg US13.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best performance score78/100
Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
- Highest torque720 Nm531 lb-ft
- Largest trunk395 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449hp335kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 561Nm414lb-ft | 720Nm531lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,050kg6,724lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 104.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.5s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 178hp/t132kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 637km396mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,371cc267cu in | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,513mm178in | 5,609mm221in |
| Width | 1,836mm72in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,592mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,685mm106in | 3,320mm131in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,685mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,670mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 125L | 395L |
| Max trunk volume | 328L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 5,350 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.5 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12 has 11 hp more than Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V and Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 2,590 kg 5,710 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 5.8 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12 has more power, Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V and Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 460 hp 343 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacXLRV 4.4 i V8 32V | Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp 335 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 561 Nm 414 lb-ft | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 2,590 kg 5,710 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 637 km 396 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac XLR V 4.4 i V8 32V
- Is 860 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 82 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 159 Nm more
- Has 270 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























