Car comparison

Cadillac CTS III 2.0vsCadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS III

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2019
VS

Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017

28T

269 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    276 hp
    206 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    168 hp/t
    125 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    537 L
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
276hp206kW
269hp201kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
69.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
66.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
22.9s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
828km514mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,966mm196in
5,103mm201in
Width
1,833mm72in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,502mm59in
Wheelbase
2,911mm115in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,568mm62in
1,591mm63in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume
447L
537L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
70L
CO2 emissions
204g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS III 2.0Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS III2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T5,300 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.9 s
35.1 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
276 hp
206 kW
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
269 hp
201 kW

Cadillac CTS III 2.0 has 7 hp more than Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
1,840 kg
4,057 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
250 km/h
155 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.06.8 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
828 km
514 mi
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS III2.0
276 hp
206 kW
6.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
269 hp
201 kW
8.1 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
269 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Cadillac CTS III 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS III2.0
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
6.8 s
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS III2.0
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
Power
276 hp
206 kW
269 hp
201 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
8.1 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
Fuel consumption
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Length
5,103 mm
200.9 in
Height
1,502 mm
59.1 in
Range score
828 km
514 mi
886 km
551 mi
CO2 score
204 g/km
-
Trunk score
447 L
15.8 cu ft
537 L
19.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS III 2.0Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T
Consumption8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.22 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.50 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,284 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac XTS Facelift 2017 28T

  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
Cadillac XTS 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacXTS28T
2.0
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
28T
2.0
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacCTS III2.0
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
28T
28T
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsCadillacCT6 II28T
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
28T
3.0d V6
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
28T
EcoBoost 245
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
28T
2.0 T5
VS
CadillacXTSFacelift 201728TvsVolvoS902.0 T5
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6
Cadillac CTS III 2.0 vs Cadillac XTS · Facelift 2017 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster