Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6vsCadillac CTS III 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Cadillac CTS III

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    171 hp/t
    128 kW/t
    5.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,200 km
    746 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
300hp224kW
276hp206kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,750kg3,858lb
1,640kg3,616lb
Gross weight
2,350kg5,181lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
69.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
19.0s
Calculated
22.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,200km746mi
Calculated
791km492mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,966mm196in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,833mm72in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,911mm115in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,568mm62in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume
505L
447L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
72L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
212g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6Cadillac CTS III 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
CadillacCTS III2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6CadillacCTS III2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.0 s
22.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
107 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
CadillacCTS III2.0
276 hp
206 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 has 24 hp more than Cadillac CTS III 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
CadillacCTS III2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
CadillacCTS III2.0
1,640 kg
3,616 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacCTS III2.0
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V66.2 s
CadillacCTS III2.06.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
CadillacCTS III2.0
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
1,200 km
746 mi
CadillacCTS III2.0
791 km
492 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacCTS III2.0
276 hp
206 kW
6.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.2 s
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
CadillacCTS III2.0
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
276 hp
206 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
1,200 km
746 mi
791 km
492 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
212 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6Cadillac CTS III 2.0
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Has 24 hp more
  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 409 km (254 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 58 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 68 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Is 110 kg lighter

Pros

  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
3.0d V6
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
2.0
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
3.0d V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacXTS28T
3.0d V6
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
3.0d V6
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 vs Cadillac CTS III 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster