Cadillac CTS I
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8vsCadillac CTS III 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS III
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque536 Nm395 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score75/100
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk447 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 276hp206kW |
| Torque | 536Nm395lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 69.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 22.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 791km492mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,865mm192in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,833mm72in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 2,911mm115in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 447L |
| Max trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 212g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 22.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW |
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8 has 129 hp more than Cadillac CTS III 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8: 129 hp (96 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 4.6 s |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 2.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacCTS III2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW | 6.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS III2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | CadillacCTS III2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 276 hp 206 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 791 km 492 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 212 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 447 L 15.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8
- Has 129 hp more
- Has 136 Nm more
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























