Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0vsCadillac CTS III 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2019
VS

Cadillac CTS III

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    255 km/h
    158 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    276 hp
    206 kW
  • Lightest
    1,484 kg
    3,272 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    186 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    199 g/km
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    791 km
    492 mi
  • Largest trunk
    447 L
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS Sedan2.0CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276hp206kW
276hp206kW
Torque
353Nm260lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,484kg3,272lb
1,640kg3,616lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
58.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
69.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
19.0s
Calculated
22.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
727km452mi
Calculated
791km492mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,644mm183in
4,966mm196in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,833mm72in
Height
1,427mm56in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
2,911mm115in
Front track
1,512mm60in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,548mm61in
1,568mm62in
Trunk volume
381L
447L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
72L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
212g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0Cadillac CTS III 2.0PowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS Sedan2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm
CadillacCTS III2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS Sedan2.0CadillacCTS III2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.0 s
22.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
108 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW
CadillacCTS III2.0
276 hp
206 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
CadillacCTS III2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
1,484 kg
3,272 lb
CadillacCTS III2.0
1,640 kg
3,616 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CadillacCTS III2.0
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.06.0 s
CadillacCTS III2.06.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
CadillacCTS III2.0
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
727 km
452 mi
CadillacCTS III2.0
791 km
492 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW
6.0 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
CadillacCTS III2.0
276 hp
206 kW
6.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.0 s
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
CadillacCTS III2.0
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS Sedan2.0CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
276 hp
206 kW
Torque
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,484 kg
3,272 lb
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
727 km
452 mi
791 km
492 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
212 g/km
Trunk score
381 L
13.5 cu ft
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0Cadillac CTS III 2.0
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

  • Is 156 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 13 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 66 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
2.0
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacCTS III2.0
2.0
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTS28T
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
Veloce 2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)3.0 V6
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 vs Cadillac CTS III 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster