Cadillac ATS Coupe
Car comparison
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6vsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Sedan
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Lightest1,484 kg3,272 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Largest trunk381 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed298 km/h185 mph
- Most powerful471 hp351 kW
- Highest torque603 Nm445 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight273 hp/t204 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 471hp351kW | 276hp206kW |
| Torque | 603Nm445lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,484kg3,272lb |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.8s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated | 58.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 488km303mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,564cc217cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,691mm185in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,384mm54in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 295L | 381L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 5,850 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW |
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 has 195 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 195 hp (145 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 4.2 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 488 km 303 mi |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW | 4.2 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 276 hp 206 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | CadillacATS Sedan2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 471 hp 351 kW | 276 hp 206 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 488 km 303 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 295 L 10.4 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 | Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Has 195 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 43 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
- Has 87 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
- Is 241 kg lighter
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 239 km (148 mi) more estimated range
- Has 86 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























