Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6vsBMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Coupe

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2016-2019
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

CS 3.0

460 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    291 hp/t
    217 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    298 km/h
    185 mph
  • Most powerful
    471 hp
    351 kW
  • Highest torque
    603 Nm
    445 lb-ft
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
471hp351kW
460hp343kW
Torque
603Nm445lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
1,580kg3,483lb
Gross weight-
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.8s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
58.7s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
12.9s
Calculated
12.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
488km303mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,564cc217cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,691mm185in
4,672mm184in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,384mm54in
1,392mm55in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance-
121mm5in
Trunk volume
295L
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
61L
60L
CO2 emissions-
197g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0PowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.06,250 rpm4,000-5,380 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.9 s
12.4 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
194 km/h
120 mph
196 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 has 11 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
1,580 kg
3,483 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V64.2 s
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.03.9 s

Although Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 has more power, BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 4.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
471 hp
351 kW
460 hp
343 kW
Torque
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
3.9 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
Range score
488 km
303 mi
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
-
197 g/km
Trunk score
295 L
10.4 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 3 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 226 km (141 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 150 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
V 3.6 V6
Grand sport 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C7)Grand sport 6.2 V8
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
V 3.6 V6
6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
V 3.6 V6
MC 4.7 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
CS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
V 3.6 V6
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
CS 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
V 3.6 V6
4.0 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
CS 3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 vs BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster