BMW M4 (F82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0vsBMW 8 Series (G15) M850i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 8 Series (G15)
M850i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight291 hp/t217 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions197 g/km
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | BMW8 Series (G15)M850i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,395kg5,280lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.7s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 48.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 648km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,851mm191in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,346mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,822mm111in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 128mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 420L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 197g/km | 240g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,380 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | BMW8 Series (G15)M850i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 194 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 530 hp 395 kW |
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i has 70 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 3.9 s |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i and BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 714 km 444 mi |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 648 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 648 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 197 g/km | 240 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 | BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (41 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 43 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























