Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
3.0d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score92/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
- Best estimated range1,351 km839 mi
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.0s Calculated | 20.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,200km746mi Calculated | 1,351km839mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 77L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.0 s | 20.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 1,200 km 746 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 1,351 km 839 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,200 km 746 mi | 1,351 km 839 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
- Has 151 km (94 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























