Cadillac CTS II
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8vsRolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Ghost I
6.6 V12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed282 km/h175 mph
- Lightest1,930 kg4,255 lb
- Best power-to-weight292 hp/t218 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score67/100
Rolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V
- Most powerful570 hp425 kW
- Highest torque780 Nm575 lb-ft
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 564hp421kW | 570hp425kW |
| Torque | 747Nm551lb-ft | 780Nm575lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 53.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 242hp/t180kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 331Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 463km287mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,600cc403cu in |
| Length | 4,859mm191in | 5,399mm213in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,948mm77in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 3,295mm130in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 385L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | 5,250-6,000 rpm | - | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 184 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | 570 hp 425 kW |
Rolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V has 6 hp more than Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Rolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 4.0 s |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | 4.9 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V has more power, Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Rolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.0 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | 570 hp 425 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 | Rolls-RoyceGhost I6.6 V12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 564 hp 421 kW | 570 hp 425 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 463 km 287 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
- Is 430 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Rolls-Royce Ghost I 6.6 V12 48V
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 33 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























