Car comparison

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2008-2014
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212)

AMG E 63 V8

525 hp6208 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8

  • Lightest
    1,765 kg
    3,891 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    297 hp/t
    222 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.6 L/100 km
    18.7 mpg US
    22.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    524 km
    325 mi
  • Largest trunk
    532 L
  • Best economy score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    282 km/h
    175 mph
  • Most powerful
    564 hp
    421 kW
  • Highest torque
    747 Nm
    551 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.8 L/100 km
    14.0 mpg US
    16.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    82/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
Power
564hp421kW
525hp391kW
Torque
747Nm551lb-ft
630Nm465lb-ft
Curb weight
1,930kg4,255lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Gross weight-
2,390kg5,269lb
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph
Calculated
39.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
12.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
297hp/t222kW/t135hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
463km287mi
Calculated
524km325mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
6,208cc379cu in
Length
4,859mm191in
4,868mm192in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,854mm73in
Height
1,473mm58in
1,464mm58in
Wheelbase
2,880mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,577mm62in
1,619mm64in
Trunk volume
385L
532L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V86,800 rpm5,200 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
12.7 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
10.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
205 km/h
127 mph
197 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
525 hp
391 kW

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 has 39 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
630 Nm
465 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
1,765 kg
3,891 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
282 km/h
175 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V84.0 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V84.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
463 km
287 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
524 km
325 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
4.0 s
282 km/h
175 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
525 hp
391 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Length
4,868 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,464 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
4.0 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
525 hp
391 kW
Torque
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.5 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
Fuel consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
12.6 L/100 km
18.7 mpg US
22.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Length
4,868 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,464 mm
57.6 in
Range score
463 km
287 mi
524 km
325 mi
Trunk score
385 L
13.6 cu ft
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8
Consumption14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.72 LC100 km22.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.40 LC100 mi35.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,859 LC/year3,308 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Has 39 hp more
  • Has 117 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8

  • Is 165 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 147 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
V 6.2 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53
V 6.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
AMG E 63 V8
E 500 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 500 V8
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster