Cadillac BLS Wagon
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T · Stage 3vsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T · Stage 1vsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T · Stage 2vsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS Wagon
2.0 T (Stage 1)
Cadillac BLS Wagon
2.0 T (Stage 2)
Cadillac BLS Wagon
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight205 hp/t153 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range699 km434 mi
- Largest trunk419 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 315hp235kW+105 hp | 248hp185kW+38 hp | 273hp204kW+63 hp | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft+165 Nm | 366Nm270lb-ft+66 Nm | 405Nm299lb-ft+105 Nm | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph-14.8 s Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-2.1 s Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph-9.5 s Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.8 s | 7.0s-0.8 s | 6.6s-1.2 s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s-12.0 s Calculated | 24.0s-7.2 s Calculated | 22.6s-8.6 s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 6.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.3s-1.1 s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.9s-0.7 s Calculated | 14.6s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 178hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 699km434mi Calculated | 699km434mi Calculated | 699km434mi Calculated | 699km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,716mm186in | 4,716mm186in | 4,716mm186in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,802mm71in | 1,802mm71in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,543mm61in | 1,543mm61in | 1,543mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,675mm105in | 2,675mm105in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,524mm60in | 1,524mm60in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 127mm5in | 127mm5in | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 419L | 419L | 419L | 419L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,273L | 1,273L | 1,273L | 1,273L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 58L | 58L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 1) 248 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 2) 273 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T 210 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.7 s | 6.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.0 s | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 24.0 s | 22.6 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.7 s | 12.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.9 s | 14.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 315 hp 235 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 248 hp 185 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 273 hp 204 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 210 hp 157 kW |
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp has 105 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T 210 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T 210 hp and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp: 105 hp (78 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 6.1 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 7.0 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 6.6 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T 210 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 2) 273 hp and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 1) 248 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 699 km 434 mi |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 699 km 434 mi |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 699 km 434 mi |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 699 km 434 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 315 hp 235 kW | 6.1 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 248 hp 185 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 273 hp 204 kW | 6.6 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 3)315 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 1)248 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T (Stage 2)273 hp | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T210 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 315 hp 235 kW | 248 hp 185 kW | 273 hp 204 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.0 s | 6.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 699 km 434 mi | 699 km 434 mi | 699 km 434 mi | 699 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 1) 248 hp | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 2) 273 hp | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T 210 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 3) 315 hp
- Has 67 hp more
- Has 99 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T (Stage 1) 248 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























