Cadillac BLS Wagon
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TvsJaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 196hp146kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 241Nm178lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.2s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 699km434mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,495cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,716mm186in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,543mm61in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,537mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 419L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,273L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.2 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 210 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW |
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 14 hp more than Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 7.8 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW | 8.5 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 196 hp 146 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 699 km 434 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 59 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























