Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012
VS

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

210 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    422 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
211hp157kW
210hp157kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,535kg3,384lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,080kg4,586lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
75.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
31.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
699km434mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,666mm184in
4,716mm186in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,802mm71in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,543mm61in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume
422L
419L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
1,273L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
58L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSICadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,300 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
31.2 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 1 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,535 kg
3,384 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.3 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,000 km
621 mi
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.3 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.8 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
699 km
434 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
-
Trunk score
422 L
14.9 cu ft
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSICadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 301 km (187 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 3 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.0 T
1.6 RC
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster