Renault Laguna II Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GTvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS Wagon
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 699km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,543mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 419L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,273L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 210 hp 157 kW |
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 6 hp more than Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 8.2 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 699 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 56 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























