Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TvsVolkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

210 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Volkswagen Golf V Variant

1.4 TSI

170 hp1390 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbo + superchargedWagon / estate2007-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI

  • Lightest
    1,383 kg
    3,049 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    743 km
    462 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TVolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
Power
210hp157kW
170hp127kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,535kg3,384lb
1,383kg3,049lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
1,990kg4,387lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
75.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
74.3s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
31.2s
Calculated
38.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
699km434mi
Calculated
743km462mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,390cc85cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,556mm179in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,781mm70in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,504mm59in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,508mm59in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
419L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
1,495L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TVolkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,300 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TVolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.2 s
38.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
170 hp
127 kW

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
1,383 kg
3,049 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T7.8 s
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI8.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
743 km
462 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
170 hp
127 kW
8.3 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,504 mm
59.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TVolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,383 kg
3,049 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,504 mm
59.2 in
Range score
699 km
434 mi
743 km
462 mi
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TVolkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI

  • Is 152 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 44 km (28 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 86 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
1.4 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
1.4 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
1.4 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20171.8 TSI
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 20171.4 TSI
2.0 T
1.6 RC
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
1.4 TSI
2.9 VR6 Syncro
VS
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro
2.0 T
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T vs Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster