Toyota Camry VI (XV40)
Car comparison
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6vsCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful277 hp207 kW
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions233 g/km
- Best estimated range707 km439 mi
- Largest trunk535 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 277hp207kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 346Nm255lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 707km439mi Calculated | 537km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,815mm190in | 4,680mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,752mm69in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 425L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 233g/km | 259g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 277 hp 207 kW |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 has 22 hp more than Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 6.8 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 707 km 439 mi |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 537 km 334 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 277 hp 207 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 277 hp 207 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 707 km 439 mi | 537 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 233 g/km | 259 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6
- Has 22 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 km (106 mi) more estimated range
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 19 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























